PitchCom: Making Every Player a Field General

Revolutionizing baseball communication with PitchCom™

Oh boy, isn't this just a marvel? The way we're progressing in technology never ceases to astound me. It's like we're witnessing a quiet, yet unstoppable, revolution right on the baseball field, and what an exciting sight it is!

The PitchCom™ communication system is, in essence, the orchestra conductor for baseball teams. It's got this neat push-button transmitter, a veritable magic wand, that calls the shots, relaying plays to each and every player. And the magic? They all hear the exact same thing. No more wild gesticulations from the coach, no more misinterpretations, or what they call in baseball, “crossed signals.”

It's being employed by every team in the Major League – if that doesn't say something about the reliability and success of this system, I don't know what does. Now, they're making it accessible to everyone: colleges, high schools, travel ball teams, the works. It's pretty cool, it's like giving them a taste of the big leagues.

What's impressive about the PitchCom system isn't just that it's light and user-friendly, but that it has an admirable battery life and quick recharging capabilities. Worries about radio interference messing with the audio? Nope, not here. It’s like a sturdy, reliable old car, but equipped with the tech of a spaceship. And let’s not forget, this thing’s been safety tested by the University of Massachusetts-Lowell, adding an extra layer of assurance.

One of the cool things I see here is how it could potentially impact the rhythm and pace of the game. No more delays, no miscommunications, just a smooth run of play. That's a definite upgrade, and one that could really shake things up.

However, the NCAA has some restrictions – only catchers can receive the audio. But guess what? PitchCom Futures, LLC has got a workaround. They've developed displays that light up with visual signs using the same system as the audio receivers. It's like an old-school scoreboard mixed with the modern tech.

The way I see it, this is a game-changer. It’s innovative and has the potential to transform how the game is played and coached. However, like any tool, its real value will be determined by how well it’s used. The system could be a step towards more dynamic, rapid gameplay, or it could just be another fancy gadget collecting dust in the dugout. I, for one, am curious to see how this plays out.


  1. Improved Communication: The PitchCom system provides a direct and immediate line of communication between coaches and players. This can enhance the strategic depth of the game by enabling quicker, more complex play calls.
  2. Uniformity: The same instructions are received by all players, eliminating possible misunderstandings or miscommunications that can occur with physical signs or verbal calls.
  3. Efficiency: With no need for physical sign language, the system could potentially speed up the game, improving its rhythm and pace. This may enhance the viewer experience and player engagement.
  4. Reliability and Security: The system is used by MLB, which speaks to its reliability. It's also designed to prevent radio interference, ensuring clear, consistent audio.
  5. Safety: The safety testing done by University of Massachusetts-Lowell adds an extra level of reassurance for users.


  1. NCAA Restrictions: As per NCAA rules, only catchers can receive audio. While the company has come up with a workaround in the form of visual displays, it's not quite as immediate or discreet as an audio transmission.
  2. Dependence on Technology: While tech can enhance a game, there's always the risk of malfunctions or technical issues. In a high-stakes game, this could be problematic.
  3. Over-reliance on Coaching: Direct communication to players could potentially diminish the need for player autonomy and quick thinking on the field. The game might become too directed from the sidelines.
  4. Cost and Accessibility: While the system is being marketed to all levels of play, there's no mention of cost. Advanced tech like this could be quite expensive, which might put it out of reach for smaller, less-funded teams.
  5. Adoption Challenges: As with any new technology, there might be resistance from traditionalists who prefer the conventional way of play-calling. Acceptance and widespread use could take time.

Remember, the real test of any product lies in its practical use. Only time will tell how well this system integrates with and enhances the sport of baseball.

Scroll to Top